Translate this page into:
Prevalence of tobacco use and its contributing factors among adolescents in Bangladesh: Results from a population-based study
*Corresponding author: Dr. Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam. shariful.islam@icddrb.org
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Tobacco use is an alarming public health problem worldwide and causes significant morbidity and mortality. In many developing countries tobacco use starts at a relative younger age. However, data on tobacco use among adolescents in Bangladesh is scarce. Objectives: The main objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of tobacco use and its contributing factors among adolescents in Bangladesh. Materials and Methods: We used data from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) Bangladesh 2007 which was a school-based survey of 2,135 students aged 13-15 years in grades 7-10. Analysis: A two-stage cluster sample design was used to produce representative data for Bangladesh. At the first stage, schools were selected with probability proportional to enrollment size. At the second stage, classes were randomly selected and all students in selected classes were eligible to participate. The GYTS sample design produced representative, independent, cross-sectional estimates for Bangladesh. Results: The overall prevalence of ever cigarette smokers in Bangladeshi students was about 9%, which was more than 3 times higher in boys compared to girls (15.8% versus 4.8%). Almost 4 in 10 students start smoking before the age of 10 in Bangladesh. In addition to current cigarette smoking, another 6% also reported to use other tobacco products currently. Nine in 10 current smokers reported that they had ever received help to stop smoking. More than 4 in 10 students were exposed to smoke from other people in public places. Among current smokers, 38.3% reported that they usually buy tobacco in a store and of which 97.8% reported that they were not refused cigarette purchase because of their age. Conclusion: Implementation and enforcement of tobacco control act is an urgent public health priority in Bangladesh.
Keywords
Acknowledgment
Authors sincerely acknowledge CDC and WHO for making the data publicly available for use.
References
- Rao S, Aslam SK, Zaheer S, Shafique K. Anti-smoking initiatives and current smoking among 19,643 adolescents in South Asia: Findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Harm Reduct J 2014;11:8.
- Rudatsikira E, Abdo A, Muula AS. Prevalence and determinants of adolescent tobacco smoking in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2007;7:176.
- Smoking and Adolescence. Available from: http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/tobacco/smoking-adolescence. [Lats accessed on 2016 Mar 05].
- Islam SM, Purnat TD, Phuong NT, Mwingira U, Schacht K, Fröschl G. Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in developing countries: A symposium report. Global Health 2014;10:81.
- Warren CW, Lee J, Lea V, Goding A, O′Hara B, Carlberg M, et al. Evolution of the global tobacco surveillance system (GTSS) 1998-2008. Glob Health Promot 2009;16 2 Suppl: 4-37.
- World Health Organization. Report on Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) and Global School Personnel Survey (GSPS) 2007 in Bangladesh. New Delhi, India: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2008.
- Das S, Ghosh M, Sarkar M, Joardar S, Chatterjee R, Chatterjee S. Adolescents speak: Why do we smoke? J Trop Pediatr 2011;57:476-80.
- World Health Organization. National tobacco control law. Bangladesh: WHO; 2014.
- Agaku IT, Adisa AO, Akinyamoju AO, Agboola SO. A cross-country comparison of the prevalence of exposure to tobacco advertisements among adolescents aged 13-15 years in 20 low and middle income countries. Tob Induc Dis 2013;11:11.
- Arora M, Gupta VK, Nazar GP, Stigler MH, Perry CL, Reddy KS. Impact of tobacco advertisements on tobacco use among urban adolescents in India: Results from a longitudinal study. Tob Control 2012;21:318-24.