Translate this page into:
How cancer of oral cavity affects the family caregivers? – A cross-sectional study in Wardha, India, using the Caregiver Quality of Life Index – Cancer questionnaire
*Corresponding author: Dr. Subodh Saran Gupta. subodhsgupta@gmail.com
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Oral cancer is now a major public health problem in India. It does not only affect the patient, but also has a deep psychosocial impact on the family caregivers who are deeply involved with the cancer patient for nursing, timely medication, and consulting the doctor. Studies have found that the caregivers often suffer from depression, anxiety, and fear of losing their near and dear ones. This study aims to capture the psychosocial impact of oral cancer on the family caregivers. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary care hospital with the primary caregivers of those oral cancer patients who completed their treatment and came for follow-up after 2–3 months of treatment completion. The study participants were recruited till a sample size of 100 was reached. This was adequate to report proportions with an error of 10%. We have used “The Caregiver Quality of Life Index – Cancer” scale to capture the psychosocial impact of oral cancer on primary caregiver of the patient. The study was initiated after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Informed written consents were obtained from all the study participants before beginning the interviews. Results: Caregivers played an important role in the recovery of the patients. However, the strain of caregiving resulted in increased emotional stress among them. We found 56% of the family caregivers were female and 41% were male. Majority of the caregivers who accompanied the patients to hospital were the spouses. For the caregivers, the mean score for burden of the disease was found to be 60.0 (±20.2), that for disruption was 50.4 (±21.7), and for positive adaptation was 61.4 (±20.7). Conclusion: Caregivers, who are usually invisible to the health-care team, should be recognized and their mental and physical well-being should also be given attention.
Keywords
References
- Fauci A, Kasper D, Braunwald E, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson J, et al. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. J Chem Inf Modeling 2008;19:1-2958.
- American Cancer Society. Global Cancer Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society; 2015. p. 1-57. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/global-cancer-facts-and-figures/global-cancer-facts-and-figures-3rd-edition.pdf. [Last assessed on 2017 Dec 20].
- Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:505-27.
- Park K. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 23rd ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publications; 2015. p. 381-90.
- National Cancer Registry Program. Three Year Report of Population Based Cancer Registries: 2012-2014. Bangalore: National Cancer Registry Program; 2014.
- Gangane N. Population Based Cancer Registry 2010-2011. Sewagram, Wardha: MGIMS; 2011. Available from: http://www.ncrpindia.org/ALL_NCRP_REPORTS/PBCR_REPORT_2009_2011/ALL_CONTENT/ALL_PDF/Wardha.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Dec 07].
- Blanchard CG, Albrecht TL, Ruckdeschel JC. The crisis of cancer: Psychological impact on family caregivers. Oncology (Williston Park) 1997;11:189-94.
- Northouse LL, Peters-Golden H. Cancer and the family: Strategies to assist spouses. Semin Oncol Nurs 1993;9:74-82.
- Weitzner MA, Jacobsen PB, Wagner H Jr., Friedland J, Cox C. The caregiver quality of life index-cancer (CQOLC) scale: Development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1999;8:55-63.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epi Info 2016;6:1-11. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo/index.html. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 12].
- Team RC. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2013. p. 1-12. Available from: http://www.r-project.org/. [Last accesed on 2017 Dec 23].
- Rigoni L, Bruhn RF, De Cicco R, Kanda JL, Matos LL. Quality of life impairment in patients with head and neck cancer and their caregivers: A comparative study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82:680-6.
- Röing M, Hirsch JM, Holmström I. Living in a state of suspension – A phenomenological approach to the spouse's experience of oral cancer. Scand J Caring Sci 2008;22:40-7.
- Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: A meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007;62:P126-37.
- Ross S, Mosher CE, Ronis-Tobin V, Hermele S, Ostroff JS. Psychosocial adjustment of family caregivers of head and neck cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2010;18:171-8.
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India. National Program for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, CVD and Stroke. Available from: http://www.dghs.gov.in/content/1363_3_NationalProgrammePreventionControl.aspx. [Last accessed on 2018 Jan 05].