Translate this page into:
Clinicopathological profile and survival impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric and GE junction cancers undergoing D2 gastrectomy: Outcomes from a tertiary centre in North India
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Ali S, Bhat MY, Lattoo MR, Sohi AS. Clinicopathological profile and survival impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric and GE junction cancers undergoing D2 gastrectomy: Outcomes from a tertiary centre in North India. South Asian J Cancer. 2026;15:288-93. doi: 10.25259/SAJC_52_2026
Abstract
Objectives:
Gastric cancer is the sixth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Although its incidence in India is comparatively low, the Kashmir Valley represents a high-risk region. The extent of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery remains debated between Eastern and Western practices. This study evaluates clinicopathological outcomes and survival after D2 gastrectomy and compares outcomes between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those undergoing upfront surgery to determine the impact of preoperative therapy on overall and disease-free survival in gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in a tertiary centre in Kashmir.
Material and Methods:
A retrospective and prospective observational study was conducted at Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar, from 2018 to 2022. Sixty patients with histologically proven gastric or GEJ carcinoma who underwent D2 gastrectomy were included. Clinical, pathological, and survival data were analysed using standard statistical methods.
Results:
The mean age was 57.9 ± 10.2 years with a male predominance (78.3%). The most common symptom was epigastric discomfort (38.3%), and the antropyloric region was the most frequent tumour site (51.7%). Subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 66.7% of patients. Median lymph node yield was 21, with ≥16 nodes retrieved in 81.6%. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 28.3% of patients, with no mortality. Most patients presented with stage III disease (51.7%); nodal involvement was observed in 65%. Lymph vascular invasion (88.3%) and perineural invasion (50%) were not significantly associated with survival. The 1-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates were 81%, 65%, and 52%, respectively. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (41.7%) demonstrated improved survival compared with upfront surgery (4-year OS: 55% vs. 48%).
Conclusion:
D2 gastrectomy is safe and effective when performed in experienced centres, achieving adequate lymph node dissection and acceptable morbidity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly with the FLOT regimen, enhances survival outcomes and should be integrated into multimodal management for advanced gastric cancer.
Keywords
Clinicopathological profile
D2 lymphadenectomy
Gastric cancer
Gastroesophageal junction cancer
Radical gastrectomy
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to evaluate clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes following D2 gastrectomy and assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in a tertiary care centre in North India.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This retrospective and prospective observational study was conducted at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, between 2018 and 2022. Sixty patients with histologically proven gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy were included. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative outcomes, and survival data were analysed. Patients with metastatic or unresectable disease, recurrent gastric cancer, non-adenocarcinoma histology, previous gastric surgery, or incomplete clinical and follow-up data were excluded from the study. D2 lymphadenectomy was performed according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) guidelines.[1] Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier methodology, and survival curves were generated for overall survival analysis.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics: Baseline patient and tumour characteristics are shown in Table 1. A total of 60 subjects were included in the final analysis. The mean age of patients having stomach malignancy was 57.88±10.22 years. Epigastric discomfort affected the majority of patients, with 23 (38.33%) reporting it, while 20 (33.33%) experienced vomiting.
| Variables | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 47 (78.3) |
| Female | 13 (21.7) |
| Age distribution | |
| <40 | 3 (5) |
| 40-65 | 46 (76.7) |
| >65 | 11 (18.3) |
| Comorbidity | |
| HTN | 17 (28.3) |
| DM | 8 (13.3) |
| Thyroid | 3 (5) |
| Other | 3 (5) |
| Smoker | 38 (63.3) |
| Non-smoker | 22 (36.7) |
| Symptoms | |
| Epigastric discomfort | 23 (38.33) |
| Melena | 8 (13.33) |
| Vomiting | 20 (33.33) |
| Loss of weight and anorexia | 9 (15) |
| Location of tumour | |
| GE junction | 13 (21.7) |
| Cardia and fundus | 8 (13.3) |
| Lesser curvature | 6 (10) |
| Greater curvature and body | 2 (3.3) |
| Antro-pyloric | 31 (51.7) |
| Bormann classification of lesions | |
| I | 5 (8.3) |
| II | 6 (10) |
| III | 42 (70) |
| IV | 7 (11.7) |
| Procedure | |
| Subtotal gastrectomy | 40 (66.7) |
| Total gastrectomy | 13 (21.7) |
| Proximal gastrectomy | 7 (11.7) |
| Duration of surgery | 197.67 (31.31) |
| Blood loss | 209.16 (51.66) |
| Drain removal | 9.48 (3.05) |
| Hospital stays | 11.88 (5.57) |
| Morbidity | n (%) |
| Wound infection | 6 (10) |
| Bilious vomiting | 2 (3.33) |
| Duodenal blowout | 1 (1.66) |
| Anastomotic leakage | 2 (3.33) |
| Abdominal collection with percutaneous drainage | 4 (6.67) |
| Melena | 1 (1.66) |
| Pleural effusion | 1 (1.66) |
| Total patients | 17 (28.33) |
HTN: Hypertension, DM: Diabetes mellitus, GE: Gastroesophageal.
Subtotal gastrectomy was done in 40 patients (66.67%), total gastrectomy in 13 patients (21.67%), and upper partial gastrectomy in 7 patients (11.66%). In our study, most of the patients had antropyloric growth. Antro-pyloric growth was observed in 31 patients (51.67%).
Most patients presented with advanced disease, with stage IIIA accounting for the largest subgroup. T4 tumours were observed in 46.7% of patients, while nodal involvement was identified in 65%. Median lymph node retrieval was 21, with ≥16 nodes retrieved in 81.6% of cases. Lymph vascular invasion and perineural invasion were observed in 88.3% and 50% of patients, respectively.
In our study, 12 patients (20%) had lost their follow-up. Thus, we had 48 patients for survival analysis. We included all these patients from Jan 2018 to April 2022 for survival analysis. The overall 3-year and 4-year survival rates were 65% and 52%, respectively [Figure 1]. For tumour stages I, II, and III, the four-year overall survival rates were 100%, 91%, and 77%, respectively [Figure 2]. Overall T and N stage-specific survival rates are mentioned in Table 2.
| Overall survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| T-stage | Time | Survival rate (%) | |
| T1 | 1 year | 100 | |
| 2 years | 100 | ||
| 3 years | 100 | ||
| 4 years | 100 | ||
| T2 | 1 year | 100 | |
| 2 years | 100 | ||
| 3 years | 100 | ||
| 4 years | 100 | ||
| T3 | 1 year | 89 | |
| 2 years | 67 | ||
| T4 | 1 year | 70 | |
| 2 years | 63 | ||
| 3 years | 52 | ||
| 4 years | 31 | ||
| N-stage | Time | Survival rate (%) | |
| N0 | 1 year | 90 | |
| 3 years | 81 | ||
| 4 years | 81 | ||
| N1 | 1 year | 67 | |
| 2 years | 67 | ||
| N2 | 1 year | 89 | |
| 2 years | 63 | ||
| 3 years | 63 | ||
| N3 | 1 year | 66 | |
| 2 years | 66 | ||
| 3 years | 51 | ||
| 4 years | 17 | ||
| Stage-specific overall survival | |||
| Stage | Time | Survival rate (%) | |
| IA | 1 year | 100 | |
| 2 years | 100 | ||
| 3 years | 100 | ||
| 4 years | 100 | ||
| IB | 1 year | 100 | |
| 2 years | 100 | ||
| 3 years | 100 | ||
| 4 years | 100 | ||
| IIA | 1 year | 91 | |
| 2 years | 61 | ||
| IIB | 1 year | 91 | |
| 2 years | 91 | ||
| 3 years | 91 | ||
| 4 years | 91 | ||
| IIIA | 1 year | 73 | |
| 2 years | 44 | ||
| 3 years | 44 | ||
| IIIB | 1 year | 64 | |
| 2 years | 64 | ||
| 3 years | 64 | ||
| III C | 1 year | 69 | |
| 2 years | 69 | ||
| 3 years | 51 | ||
| 4 years | 17 | ||
| Overall survival | |||
| Time | Survival rate (%) | ||
| 1 year | 81 | ||
| 2 years | 72 | ||
| 3 years | 65 | ||
| 4 years | 52 | ||


In our study, out of 60 patients, 25 (41.7%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy—19 with the FLOT regimen and 6 with CapOx—while 35 (58.3%) underwent upfront surgery. Among those not receiving neoadjuvant therapy, 28 presented in emergency settings due to bleeding or obstruction, and 7 declined chemotherapies. Adjuvant CapOx therapy was administered to 21 patients, with a compliance rate of 60%. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 28.3% of patients, with no perioperative mortality. The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 4-year survival rates were 81%, 65%, and 52%, respectively, and disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years was 77.1% and 47.1%. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated improved outcomes, achieving overall survival rates of 85%, 70%, and 55% at 1, 3, and 4 years, respectively, compared with 78%, 60%, and 48% in the upfront surgery cohort [Figure 3].

DISCUSSION
Total gastrectomy or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection is the standard recommended procedure for carcinoma of the stomach.[2-4] There is increasing global consensus on performing a D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer due to the long-term results of large Western studies with Eastern data.[5-8] However, there is a scarcity of data from the Kashmir Valley, a high-incidence area of gastric cancer, regarding the outcome of D2 lymphadenectomy for a curative gastrectomy.[9]
In the present study, most patients presented with advanced-stage disease, with stage III disease accounting for 51.7% of the cohort. Similar observations have been reported from Indian studies by Nandi et al. and Franklyn et al., where delayed presentation and absence of routine screening contributed to diagnosis at advanced stages.[10,11] The high burden of advanced disease in the Kashmir Valley highlights the need for improved awareness and early detection strategies in this high-risk population.
The mean age of presentation in our study was 57.9 years, with a marked male predominance. Smoking was commonly observed among patients, consistent with previously reported Indian data suggesting tobacco exposure as an important associated risk factor in gastric malignancy.[3] The antropyloric region was the most frequent tumour location in our cohort, observed in 51.7% of cases. This predominance of distal gastric tumours has also been documented in other Indian studies, including those by Pareekutty et al. and Sharma and Radhakrishnan.[4,12] In contrast, Western literature has shown a gradual increase in proximal and gastroesophageal junction tumours.[13]
The present study demonstrated acceptable perioperative outcomes following D2 gastrectomy. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 28.3% of patients, while no perioperative mortality was observed. Indian experiences, particularly in the Tata Memorial Hospital series by Shrikhande et al., have similarly demonstrated that D2 lymphadenectomy can be safely performed with acceptable complication rates in specialised and high-volume centres.[14]
Adequate lymph node retrieval is essential for accurate staging and oncological clearance in gastric cancer surgery. In our study, the median lymph node yield was 21, with more than 16 lymph nodes retrieved in 81.6% of patients, meeting recommended oncological standards. Comparable lymph node yields have been reported in Indian studies evaluating D2 gastrectomy outcomes.[12,14] Most patients in our series had advanced pathological disease, with T4 tumours identified in 46.7% and nodal involvement in 65% of patients. Although lymph vascular and perineural invasion were frequently observed, they did not demonstrate statistically significant prognostic impact in the present cohort, possibly due to the limited sample size. Survival outcomes were adversely affected by increasing tumour depth and nodal stage, with poorer survival observed in stage III and N3 disease.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a favourable impact on survival outcomes in the present study. Patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy achieved improved 1-year, 3-year, and 4-year overall survival compared with those undergoing upfront surgery. Most patients in our cohort received the FLOT regimen, which was associated with acceptable tolerability and improved long-term outcomes. These findings are consistent with contemporary evidence supporting perioperative chemotherapy as a standard component of multimodal treatment for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.[15] Recent Indian studies have also reported encouraging outcomes with neoadjuvant and perioperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Janarthinakani et al. demonstrated improved survival trends in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in a real-world Indian setting.[16] Similarly, Ramaswamy et al. reported favourable pathological and survival outcomes with perioperative modified FLOT compared with EOX in resectable gastric cancer oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.[17] Our findings support the growing adoption of perioperative chemotherapy, particularly FLOT-based regimens, in the management of locally advanced gastric cancer in India.
Limitations
The present study has several limitations. First, it was conducted at a single tertiary care centre with a relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, inclusion of both retrospective and prospective data may have introduced heterogeneity in data collection and follow-up. Third, approximately 20% of patients were lost to follow-up, which could have influenced survival analysis. Finally, the relatively short duration of follow-up limited the assessment of long-term and 5-year survival outcomes. Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable real-world data regarding D2 gastrectomy and perioperative chemotherapy outcomes in gastric cancer from a high-incidence region of North India.
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
This study demonstrates that D2 gastrectomy can be performed safely and effectively in specialised tertiary care centres with acceptable morbidity, no perioperative mortality, and adequate lymph node retrieval meeting oncological standards. Most patients in our cohort presented with advanced-stage disease, underscoring the urgent need for earlier diagnosis and improved awareness in high-incidence regions such as the Kashmir Valley. Importantly, patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly FLOT-based regimens, achieved improved survival outcomes compared with upfront surgery, supporting the integration of perioperative chemotherapy into standard multidisciplinary management of locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The present study adds valuable real-world evidence from North India and reinforces the role of standardised D2 lymphadenectomy combined with multimodal therapy in improving long-term oncological outcomes.
Ethical approval:
The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at IEC -Skims, Number IEC/Skims Protocol #206/2023, dated 3rd July 2023.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient's consent not required as the patient’s identity is not disclosed or compromised.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- JGCA (The Japan Gastric Cancer Association) gastric cancer treatment guidelines. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:58.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-86.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gastric cancer in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2011;32:12-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Predictors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 1992;65:245-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comparison of international guidelines on the accompanying therapy for advanced gastric cancer: Reasons for the differences. J Gastric Cancer. 2015;15:10-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:2875-93.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Changing pattern of common cancers in the last five years in Kashmir, India: A retrospective observational study. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2021;42:439-43.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Clinicopathological profile of gastric cancer in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India: A prospective 2-year study. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2014;3:14-20.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Surgical outcomes associated with operable gastric cancer in a tertiary care Indian hospital. J Gastric Cancer. 2017;17:63-73.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for carcinoma stomach in a standalone cancer centre in rural India. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020;11:256-62.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Population-based investigation of common and deviating patterns of gastric cancer and oesophageal cancer incidence across populations and time. Gut. 2023;72:846-54.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer in Tata Memorial Hospital. Dig Surg. 2006;23:192-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comparison between upfront surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;15:1808-18.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer? A real-world evidence study. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2020;41:832-40.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Perioperative modified FLOT versus EOX in locally advanced resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Results of a matched-pair analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023;54:820-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


