Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Series
Original Article
Original Article General Medicine
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Series
Original Article
Original Article General Medicine
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/SAJC_27_2025

Clinicopathological and demographic spectrum of colorectal cancer

M S Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Pavan Sugoor, Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. pavansugoor26@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Rao AN, Sathya Narayana A, Bellur VC, Prasad A, Sugoor P. Clinicopathological and demographic spectrum of colorectal cancer. South Asian J Cancer. 2025 doi: 10.25259/SAJC_27_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Data regarding the demography and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) especially in a country as diverse as India, remains incomplete. This study aims to further examine the clinical and pathological features of colorectal cancer in a cancer centre in South India.

Material and Methods:

All patients undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer in a tertiary cancer centre were included in this study. The patient characteristics were analysed with respect to location, differentiation, staging, and tumour morphology.

Results:

A total of 831 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Rectal cancer was more prevalent than colon cancer (64% vs 36%). The most common tumourhistological subtype was moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (78.6%). Mucinous and signet ring cell subtypes were the next most commonly encountered, at 11.4% and 7.6% respectively. Fifty eight percent of patients presented in stage III, and 25.5% were stage IV. Females were found to have a higher T stage at diagnosis than males (p = 0.03). Colon cancers were more likely to be of a mucinous subtype than rectal cancers (p = 0.000). In addition, colon cancers were more likely to have poor differentiation when compared to their rectal counterparts (p = 0.012).

Conclusions:

Our study identifies that by the time of diagnosis, most patients are already at advanced stages compared to those from higher-income countries. In addition, the proportion of patients presenting with aggressive histological characteristics is also higher than that in other higher-income nations.

Keywords

Colon cancer
Epidemiology
Pathology
Rectal cancer
Signet ring cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality.[1,2] Colorectal cancer incidence is markedly higher in the West as compared to the East; however, this trend is slowly changing, likely due to continued westernisation of Eastern nations.

Colorectal cancer, like many other cancers, results from genetic mutations in oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes.

Most commonly, colorectal cancer presents sporadically; the pathogenesis of most of these cancers follows a well-defined adenoma carcinoma sequence.[3]

Colorectal cancer has many recognised risk factors, which include but are not limited to age, presence of IBD, a family history of colorectal neoplasms, and a sedentary lifestyle.[3-7]

Despite the lower incidence rates of colorectal cancer in India, there are still recognised differences in the clinical and pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer in India when compared to the west, mainly a lower age at presentation, preponderance for left-sided tumours, and increased proportion of signet ring cell morphology.[8,9]

Data regarding the demography and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer, especially in a country as diverse as India, remains incomplete. This study aims to further examine the clinical and pathological features of colorectal cancer in a cancer centrein South India.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study of a prospectively maintained CRC institutional database in a tertiary care cancer centrein South India.

All patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancers undergoing treatment at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology from January 2021 to February 2025 were included in this study. Patients with secondary or recurrent colorectal cancers were excluded. Patients whose records were incomplete were also excluded.

Patient data such as age, sex, religion, literacy, as well as tumour characteristics such as location, histology, and stage at presentation were recorded.

Location (subsite) of the tumourwas classified broadly into colon and rectum. Under the colon, the tumour was further classified into right (cecum, appendix, ascending colon, transverse colon) or left colon (descending colon and sigmoid colon). Rectosigmoid tumours were considered as rectal tumours for the sake of analysis. Histological information was recorded by a trained pathologist. Data was extracted into SPSS, and descriptive statistics were calculated.

The patient characteristics (age and sex) were analysedwith respect to sex, location, differentiation, signet and mucinous morphology, and staging (both tumour node metastasis and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage grouping).

The chi-square test was used to determine the association between groups of categorical variables, while the t-test was used to determine the association between means. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant as per convention. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 for Windows.

RESULTS

A total of 831 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the study participants was 52.74 ± 14.27 years, of which 57.8% were male.

Rectal cancers formed the bulk of incident colorectal cancers (64.0%), while 36% were of colonic origins. The most common tumourhistological subtype was moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Mucinous and signet ring cell subtypes were the next most commonly encountered, at 11.4% and 7.6% respectively. Over half of the patients (58.2%) presented in stage III, and 25.5% were stage IV.

CRC showed sex differences concerning T staging at diagnosis, in which females were found to have a higher T stage at diagnosis than males (87.1% vs 81.6%, p = 0.03). There was also a significantly increased rate of illiteracy among females diagnosed with CRC when compared to males [Table 1].

Table 1: Sex based characteristics of colorectal cancer
Characteristics Characteristics of colorectal cancer in males n = 480 Characteristics of colorectal cancer in females n =351 p value
Age (mean ± SD) 53.00 ± 14 51 ± 14 0.539
Rectal tumors 304 (63.3%)
Colonic tumors 176 (36.6%) 123 (35.0%) 0.630
Right sided 104 (59.0%) 81 (65.8%)
Left sided 72 (40.9%)
Histology
Adenocarcinoma NOS 377 (78.5%) 276 (78.6%)
Mucinous subtype 60 (12.5%) 35 (9.9%)
Signet ring cell subtype 33 (6.8%) 30 (8.5%)
Squamous cell 3 (0.6%) 5 (1.4%)
neuroendocrine 5 (1.04%) 5 (1.4%)
Others 2 (0.4%) 0 (0%) 0.424
Differentiation
Well differentiated 25 (52.0%) 20 (5.6%)
Moderately differentiated 369 (76.8%) 268 (76.3%)
Poorly differentiated 86 (17.9%) 63 (17.9%) 0.953
Early (T1-T2) 88 (18.3%) 45 (12.8%)
Advanced (T3-T4) 392 (81.6%) 306 (87.1%) 0.032
N Stage at presentation
N0 76 (15.8%) 59 (16.8%)
N+ 404 (84.1%) 292 (83.1%) 0.706
M stage at presentation
M0 357 (74.3%) 265 (75.5%)
M+ 123 (25.6%) 86 (24.5%) 0.712
Literacy (literate %) 240 (50%) 103 (29.3%) 0.00
Religion
Hindu 414 (86.2%) 303 (86.3%)
Muslim 63 (13.1%) 41 (11.7%)
Christian 3 (0.6%) 7 (2%) 0.174

p < 0.05 considered significant. SD: Standard deviation, NOS: Not otherwise specified

Generally, colonic and rectal tumoursdid not show many significant differences. Of note, colon cancers were more likely to be of a mucinous subtype than rectal cancers (p = 0.000). In addition, colon cancers were more likely to have poor differentiation when compared to their rectal counterparts (p = 0.012) [Table 2].

Table 2: Characteristics of colon versus rectal cancer
Characteristics Characteristics of colon cancer Characteristics of rectal cancer p value
Age (mean ± SD) 53 ± 13 53 ± 15 0.821
Histology
Adenocarcinoma NOS 209 (69.9%) 444 (83.4%)
Mucinous subtype 61 (20.4%) 34 (6.4%) 0.00
Signet ring cell subtype 23 (7.6%) 40 (7.5%) 0.928
Squamous cell 1 (0.3%) 7 (1.3%)
Neuroendocrine 5 (1.7%) 5 (0.9%)
Others 0 (0%) 2 (0.4%)
Differentiation
Well differentiated 13 (4.3%) 32 (6.0%)
Moderately differentiated 217 (72.5%) 420 (79%)
Poorly differentiated 69 (23.1%) 80 (15%) 0.012
T stage at presentation
Early (T1-T2) 47 (15.7%) 86 (16.2%)

p < 0.05 considered significant. SD: Standard deviation, NOS: Not otherwise specified, TNM: Tumour, node, metastasis.

DISCUSSION

Colorectal cancer is an emergingcancer epidemic, constituting 10% of the global cancer burden.[10,11] We studied the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC with the help of available data from a quaternary care cancer centre in South India. The analysis of patient demographics, sex-based characteristics, tumour characteristics, and their variation by tumour location was conducted. A total of 831 patients with colorectal malignancy were part of the study from 2020 to 2025.

Etiologically, increasing age is known to be a key factor in the development of colorectal malignancy. Studies worldwide have indicated that the risk of colorectal cancer increases 2-fold every 5 years till the age of 50 and plateaus from the age of 50, as early detection of pre-cancerous lesions after the age of 50 is more likely due to improved screening. While the mean age range of incidence of colorectal cancer ranges from 55 to 70 across various studies, our study detected colorectal cancer at a mean age of 52.7 ± 14.2 years. We found that patients were diagnosed with CRC at a marginally younger age in comparison to the current world trends, which may be contributing to the rise of early onset of colorectal cancer.[1215] This rising trend of young-onset colorectal cancer is particularly pronounced in the Indian subcontinent, known to be a low-prevalence area for colorectal cancer, with multiple studies done in high-volume cancer centres showing a reduced age of incidence across the country.[8,10,16]

Based on tumourlocation, our data indicated that rectal cancers have a slightly higher incidence than colonic tumours since the majority of the patients (64%) were diagnosed with rectal cancer. This is in line with data reported from other Indian centres. In contrast, data reported from other countries, such as the US or South Korea, indicate higher prevalence rates of colon cancer.[8,10,14,17]

Analysis of the histopathological type of cancer indicated that adenocarcinoma constituted the majority of the cases (653 cases) (78.6%), followed by Mucinous and Signet Ring cell subtypes - 11.4% and 7.6% respectively. This corresponds with studies worldwide, which demonstrate that the adenocarcinoma subtype is the most common histopathological variant. The signet ring cell subtype and the mucinous subtype have higher percentages than other regions worldwide. This could be attributed to the younger age of our cohort, as young-onset colorectal cancer tends to be associated with aggressive histological features. Signet ring subtypes, in particular, are known for their aggressive behaviour and poor outcomes. They are rare subtypes, composing about 1% of colorectal adenocarcinomas. However, this subtype is more prevalent in India, with prevalence rates reaching 19% in some regions of the country.[1820]

We also recognisedthat by the time of diagnosis, most patients are already at advanced stages, both histopathologically and radiologically, compared to the data and studies conducted in higher-income countries. Lower literacy rates of the population, lack of early screening protocols, and limited accessibility to healthcare may have contributed to this trend. Less than 10% of adults eligible for screening actually undergo screening in India, which presents an area of unmet need that, if tackled, may drastically improve outcomes.[21] The majority of the patients were diagnosed to have moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated histopathological characteristics in our study. Moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated carcinomas are known to be aggressive carcinomas with a poorer prognosis. The indication of the majority of patients presenting with aggressive carcinoma highlights the need for early screening policies and equitable access to healthcare in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC).

In conclusion, there is a rising trend of young-onset CRC according to our study, where rectal cancers were found to be of higher prevalence. Histopathologically, these cancers are usually of the Adenocarcinoma subtype, while mucinous and signet ring subtypes also showed significantly higher percentages. We also highlight that the delay in diagnosis poses a significant challenge, contributing to the progression of the disease and diagnosis at an advanced stage. Hence, routine screening, health education, and identification of risk factors of CRC can help in early detection and management of Young-Onset CRC.

Declaration

This study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, or with comparable ethical standards.

No funding was received for conducting this study.

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Colorectal cancer in India demonstrates a distinct clinical and pathological profile, with a substantial proportion of patients presenting at a younger age, advanced stage, and with aggressive pathological features. These findings underscore the need for improved screening strategies, heightened clinical vigilance, and tailored public health interventions.

Acknowledgements:

We wish to thank the Departmentof Surgical Oncology at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology for their support.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required as it is a retrospective study.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using the AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , . Colorectal carcinoma: A general overview and future perspectives in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:197.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:713-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:919-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Meta-analysis: colorectal and small bowel cancer risk in patients with Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:1097-104.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001;48:526-35.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Associations between potential causal factors and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies. J Dig Dis. 2022;23:435-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Colorectal cancer in India: an audit from a tertiary center in a low prevalence area. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017;8:484-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Colorectal cancer profile in a tertiary care centre, Bangalore, India. Online J Health Allied Sci Available from: http://www.ojhas.org/issue49/2014.13.html. [Last accessed 2025 October 5]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Colorectal cancers in low-and middle-income countries-demographic pattern and clinical profile of 970 patients treated at a tertiary care cancer center in India. JCO Glob Oncol. 2021;7:GO.21.00111.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: A review with special emphasis on India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025;44:142-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in European countries in the colorectal cancer screening era: an international population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1002-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Epidemiology of colorectal cancer in average risk adults 20-39 years of age: A population-based national study. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:3602-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:233-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Young onset colorectal cancer. South Asian J Cancer. 2024;13:225-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Epidemiological trends of colorectal cancer cases in young population of Eastern India: A retrospective observational study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2024;20:817-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Clinical characteristics and survival of colorectal cancer patients in Korea stratified by age. Korean J Intern Med. 2021;36:985-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Trends in the incidence and survival rates of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma in the South Korean population: Analysis of the Korea Central Cancer Registry database. J Clin Med. 2021;10:4258.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of early-onset colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2019;125:2002-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Spatial epidemiology of signet-ring cell colorectal cancer in India. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024;12:71-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Screening for colorectal carcinoma in India: Real-world scenario, pitfalls, and solutions. South Asian J Cancer. 2025;13:229-35.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections