An Ayurveda Gargle Regimen in Management of Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis

Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar; Sonali Pingley; Shaileshkumar Shende; Dhananjay Kelkar; Amit Parasnis; Mahesh Sambhus; Girish Phadake; Sachin Hingmire; Padmaj Kulkarni; Chetan Deshmukh

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1726138

View/Download PDF

Buy Reprints

PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article: Supportive and Palliative Care

09 (

); 250-252

doi:

10.1055/s-0041-1726138

An Ayurveda Gargle Regimen in Management of Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis

Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar^1,, Sonali Pingley², Shaileshkumar Shende², Dhananjay Kelkar³, Amit Parasnis³, Mahesh Sambhus³, Girish Phadake³, Sachin Hingmire⁴, Padmaj Kulkarni⁴, Chetan Deshmukh⁴

1 Department of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India

2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India

3 Department of Surgical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India

4 Department of Medical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India

*Corresponding author: Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar, MD, Ayurveda, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Near Mhatre Bridge, Erandawne, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India. drwpankaj@gmail.com

Published: 2021-06-15

MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background Radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) in patients with head and neck cancer may lead to significant morbidity. OM may result in erythema, ulceration, and pseudomembrane formation. The usual time of onset is second or third week of radiotherapy (RT), after the doses of 16 to 18 Gy. OM may cause severe pain, significant weight loss, increased resource use, interruption or discontinuation of the treatment, and added cost of supportive care.

Materials and Methods Patients who underwent RT and chemoradiation (CTRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) from 2015 to 2016 were included. The patients who were treated with the add-on Ayurveda gargle regimen (AGR) of sapthachhadadi gandoosham were evaluated against patients treated with standard symptomatic care (SSC).

Statistical Analysis Chi-square test was used to compare the difference between the two groups in the present study with SPSS (SPSS version 20 for Windows package SPSS Science, Chicago, IL, USA). software.

Result Grade III to IV OM was lower in the AGR group when compared with the SSC group (p < 0.001). Onset of OM was significantly delayed in patients from the AGR group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion The AGR with sapthachhadadi gandoosham is effective in delaying the onset and reducing severity of OM in HNSCC, without compromising the rate of locoregional recurrence.

Keywords

Introduction

Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most common acute toxicities in patients with neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), undergoing radiation/radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CTRT).

OM may cause significant morbidity during RT in HNSCC patients, which is one of the most common acute adverse effects of RT. OM may result in erythema, ulceration, pseudomembrane formation. The usual time of onset is second or third week of RT after the doses of 16 to 18 Gy. OM is associated with severe pain, significant weight loss, increased resource use, interruption or discontinuation of the treatment, and added cost of supportive care. Preventive strategies are, therefore, valuable.¹

Ayurveda, the ancient Indian system of medicine, has traditionally recommended topical gargle termed “gandoosham” in Sanskrit for the management of mucositis in general.² This low-cost regimen may be an effective intervention to reduce the incidence and severity of OM and, thus, may positively contribute in the management of RT-induced OM in HNSCC.

Materials and Methods

Patients who received RT and CTRT for HNSCC from 2015 to 2016 were reviewed. Comparative analysis of the patients who were treated with the add-on Ayurveda gargle regimen (AGR) (Table 1) and patients on chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% weight/volume gargle as standard symptomatic care (SSC) was done. This analysis included patients of either gender, from the age of 18 years to 70 years, with HNSCC including oral cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx undergoing RT or CTRT. Patients with recurrent HNSCC were included if they had not received RT previously.

Table 1

Composition of ready to use Indian Food and Drug Administration–approved GMP (good manufacturing practice)-certified Ayurveda gargle

Sapthachhadadi gandoosham
Alstonia scholaris	Induces cellular immune response³
Vertiveria zizanioides	Antifungal⁴
Trichosanthes dioca	Anti-inflammatory,⁵ wound healing, antiulcer⁶
Cyperus rotundus	Antimicrobial, antioxidant⁷
Terminalia chebula	Antimicrobial,³ antiadherent⁸
Solanum xanthocarpum	Analgesic⁹
Picrorhiza kurroa	Antiulcer¹⁰
Santalum album	Antiviral, anticancer¹¹
Glycyrrhiza glabra	Heals oral mucositis^12–14
Cassia fistula	Antimicrobial

Method of Use

Patients in the AGR group were following gargling with sapthachhadadi gandoosham 20 mL, diluted in 100 mL water just before use. The median frequency of gargling per day was 6 times (range 4–10). The gargles were advised from week 1 of RT for 7 weeks in the AGR group.

Patients were clinically examined weekly during the period of RT/CTRT and were followed-up for 3 months at regular intervals for post-RT acute toxicity. The electronic Lent Soma Scale was used to assess acute RT toxicity.¹⁵

Patients in both the groups received saline and baking soda gargle as prophylactic treatment. Once mucositis was developed, treatment prescribed in both the groups was NSAIDs (non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs), topical anesthetics, and steroids as per the standard of care.

Patients were followed till completion of 3 years post RT to detect any locoregional/systemic recurrences.

Results

Out of 62 patients, 32 were treated with add-on AGR and 30 patients were on SSC. Patients received either type of RT—conventional radiotherapy (CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). CRT was received by 46.7% patients in the SSC group and 65.6% patients in the AGR group, while those treated with IMRT were 53.3% patients in the SSC group and 34.4% patients in the AGR group.

The field of irradiation was unilateral for 26.7% patients in the SSC group and 28.1% patients in the AGR group, while it was bilateral for 73.3% patients in the SSC group and 71.9% patients in the AGR group.

The average dose of RT was similar in both the groups (63.66 ± 5.55 Gy in the SSC group and 63.35 ±4.63 Gy in the AGR group).

Grade III OM was observed in 43.3% patients in the SSC group and in only 6.2% patients in the AGR group (p < 0.001). Grade III dysphagia was reported in 56.7% patients in the SSC group as compared with only 15.6% patients in the AGR group (p < 0.001). Thus, the need of nasogastric (NG) feeding tube was reduced in AGR group (p < 0.05).

The onset of OM in the AGR group with CTRT was week 4 to week 5, and in the SSC group it was toward the end of week 2 (p < 0.001).

Weekly cisplatin was administered concurrently in 63.3% and56.25% patients as standard of care in the SSC and AGR groups, respectively. An average dose of 200 mg cisplatin concurrently was received by 19 patients in the AGR group and 18 in the SSC group.

RT was completed by 32/32 patients in the study group while in the control group 28/30 patients completed the treatment.

The rate of recurrence at the end of 3 years was similar in both the groups (33.3% in the SSC group and 28.1% in the AGR group). OM and dysphagia were significantly reduced in the AGR group (p < 0.002).

Discussion

Sapthachhadadi gandoosham has been documented as gargle for mucositis in ancient Indian doctrines of Ayurveda, and is presently known to have antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer, antiadherent, and antiulcer properties in various published biomedical researches. The wound healing and cellular immune responsive action would have contributed to the observed therapeutic role in radiation-induced OM.

Ayurveda gargle regime (AGR) is cost-effective and easy to use. AGR is observed to be effective in the management of OM and dysphagia, and in reducing need of NG tube feeding. Thus, it has improved quality of life in HNSCC patients undergoing RT and reduced the possibility of added cost of supportive and symptomatic care.

However, small sample size and nonrandomized study remain as the limitations of the present study. Randomized study with a larger sample is recommended.

Conclusion

The AGR with sapthachhadadi gandoosham is effective in delaying the onset and reducing the severity of OM in HNSCC without compromising the rate of locoregional recurrence.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure

Download

References

Elting L S, Cooksley C D, Chambers M S, Garden A S, . Risk, outcomes, and costs of radiation-induced oral mucositis among patients with head-and-neck malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(04):1110-1120.
[Google Scholar]
Paradkar H, . ed. Mukharog-pratishedha: chapter 22 verse 103. Commentary Sarvangasundar of Arundatta and Ayurveda Rasayana of Hemadri on Ashtanghridayam of Vagbhata, Uttar-sthana. Varanasi, India:. Choukhambha Orientalia 2005:857.
[Google Scholar]
Iwo M I, Soemardji A A, Retnoningrum D S, Sukrasno U UM, U. U M, . Immunostimulating effect of pule (Alstonia scholaris L. R.Br., Apocynaceae) bark extracts. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2000;23(02/04):177-183.
[Google Scholar]
Snigdha M, Kumar S S, Mohapatra S, Deepa C, . An overview on Vetiveria zizanioides. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2013;4:777-783.
[Google Scholar]
Kumar N, Singh S Manvi, Gupta R, . Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.: An overview. Pharmacogn Rev. 2012;6(11):61-67.
[Google Scholar]
Kumar N, Singh S Manvi, Gupta R, . Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.: an overview. Pharmacogn Rev. 2012;6(11):61-67.
[Google Scholar]
Kilani-Jaziri S, Bhouri W, Skandrani I, . Phytochemical, antimicrobial, antioxidant and antigenotoxic potentials of Cyperus rotundus extracts. S Afr J Bot.. 2011;77(03):767-776.
[Google Scholar]
Carounanidy U, Satyanarayanan R, Velmurugan A, . Use of an aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula as an anticaries agent: a clinical study. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18(04):152-156.
[Google Scholar]
Bhadoria N, Gunwal M K, Suryawanshi H, Sonarkar S S, . Antiadherence and antimicrobial property of herbal extracts (Glycyrrhiza glabra and Terminalia chebula) on Streptococcus mutans: an in vitro experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23(01):73-77.
[Google Scholar]
Kumar S, Pandey A K, . Medicinal attributes of Solanum xanthocarpum fruit consumed by several tribal communities as food: an in vitro antioxidant, anticancer and anti HIV perspective. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:112.
[Google Scholar]
Banerjee D, Maity B, Nag S K, Bandyopadhyay S K, Chattopadhyay S, . Healing potential of Picrorhiza kurroa (Scrofulariaceae) rhizomes against indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration: a mechanistic exploration. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8:3.
[Google Scholar]
Santha S, Dwivedi C, . Anticancer effects of sandalwood (Santalum album) Anticancer Res. 2015;35(06):3137-3145.
[Google Scholar]
Najafi S, Koujan S E, Manifar S, Kharazifard M J, Kidi S, Hajheidary S, . Preventive effect of Glycyrrhiza glabra extract on oral mucositis in patients under head and neck radiotherapy: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14(05):267-274.
[Google Scholar]
Ghalayani P, Emami H, Pakravan F, Nasr Isfahani M, . Comparison of triamcinolone acetonide mucoadhesive film with licorice mucoadhesive film on radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(02):e48-e56.
[Google Scholar]
LENT SOMA scales for all anatomic sites. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(05):1049-1091.
[Google Scholar]