South Asian Journal of Cancer

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year
: 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 26--40

Mucosal melanoma of the head-and-neck region: A single institutional clinical experience


Mathumitha Ramesh, Siddhartha Nanda, Biplab Misra 
 Department of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Siddhartha Nanda
Department of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
India




How to cite this article:
Ramesh M, Nanda S, Misra B. Mucosal melanoma of the head-and-neck region: A single institutional clinical experience.South Asian J Cancer 2019;8:26-40


How to cite this URL:
Ramesh M, Nanda S, Misra B. Mucosal melanoma of the head-and-neck region: A single institutional clinical experience. South Asian J Cancer [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Apr 24 ];8:26-40
Available from: http://journal.sajc.org/text.asp?2019/8/1/26/250091


Full Text

Dear Editor,

Due to the rarity of mucosal melanoma, the scientific knowledge is limited compared to its cutaneous counterpart. Weber reported the first case of mucosal melanoma of the head-and-neck region in 1856.[1] The largest case series of mucosal melanoma of the head-and-neck region was reported by Bachar et al.[2] with 61 patients over 41 years and in India, Gupta et al.[3] reported 42 patients over the period of 8 years. This is one such attempt with four cases over 1 year.

A 26-year-old female patient presented with the complaints of epistaxis and nasal obstruction. Computed tomography-scan (CT) revealed a large expansile soft-tissue mass in the right maxillary sinus extending into the nasal cavity, right upper alveolar arch, right orbit, and right buccal space. Biopsy and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of malignant melanoma [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].{Figure 1}{Figure 2}

The patient underwent right total maxillectomy with right orbital exenteration and the bony margin was involved by tumor. Adjuvant radiotherapy of 60 Gy in 6 weeks was delivered. Unfortunately, 4 months after the completion of treatment, the patient developed recurrent right submandibular lymphnode, bilateral lung metastasis along with nodular lesions in retroperitoneal and right infrarenal region. The patient was started on palliative chemotherapy (paclitaxel + carboplatin). After three cycles of chemotherapy, contrast-enhanced CT scan (CECT) showed all the retroperitoneal and infrarenal lesions had regressed completely, whereas there was a partial reduction in the right submandibular lymphnode and lung metastasis. In view of the good response, the patient was given three more cycles of the same chemotherapy regimen. After 1 month, the follow-up CECT scan showed residual right submandibular lymph node and persisting bilateral lung metastasis. The patient was put on Tablet Sorafenib. Due to toxicity, she was shifted to an alternative chemotherapy regimen (dacarbazine + cisplatin). After three cycles, positron-emission tomography (PET-CT scan) showed the persistence of the previous disease and an appearance of new metastatic involving right iliac bone for which the patient received palliative radiotherapy. At present, the patient is put on tablet Imatinib and has a stable disease condition until the last follow-up.

A 43-year-old male presented with complaint of blackish mass in the right buccal mucosa. The biopsy from this lesion confirmed melanocarcinoma. He underwent inferior partial maxillectomy, and the postoperative histopathology showed malignant melanoma. All margins were uninvolved by tumor with no perineural invasion or lymphovascular invasion [Figure 3].{Figure 3}

The patient received immunotherapy as adjuvant treatment. However, after 3 months of disease-free interval, the patient had regional reccurrence in right level II lymphnode confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and PET-CT scan [Figure 4]. The patient underwent bilateral modified radical neck dissection.{Figure 4}

Following which the patient received radiotherapy of 60 Gy in 6 weeks. The patient had no evidence of disease until last follow-up.

A 62-year-old male presented with complaints of Left nasal blockage, protruding Left nasal mass covering the whole of the Left nasal cavity and swelling in the Left side of the hard palate. The CECT-scan showed a locally advanced lesion in the Left nasal cavity, Left maxillary cavity which was extending to the oral cavity along with liver and lung metastasis. The biopsy and immunohistochemical of nasal mass confirmed the diagnosis of malignant mucosal melanoma [Figure 5] and [Figure 6].{Figure 5}{Figure 6}

The patient was treated with palliative chemotherapy (dacarbazine, cisplatin, and vinblastine X six cycles). Later, he received palliative radiotherapy for epistaxis. At the last follow-up, the patient had no bleeding from the local site and had a stable disease.

The patient was treated with palliative chemotherapy (dacarbazine, cisplatin, and vinblastine X six cycles). Later, he received palliative radiotherapy for epistaxis. At the last follow-up, patient had no bleeding from the local site and had stable disease.

A 68-year-old female presented with complaints of bulging of the left eye with occasional bleeding from the left eye. CT-scan showed an intraorbital mass on the posterolateral wall of the left orbit. She underwent left orbital exenteration, and the postoperative histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of malignant melanoma of the eye. Neck dissection was planned, but the patient was lost to follow-up [Table 1].{Table 1}

In western studies,[2],[4] the mean age was 65–70 years. In an Indian study,[3] mean age was 53 years which was similar to our series (49.7 years). The majority of mucosal melanoma arises in the sinonasal and oral cavity[2],[3] which correlates with our study. According to Szabo,[5] this is mainly due to the high density of melanocytes in these regions.

According to many studies,[2],[6],[7] the female patients were relatively younger and had a better prognosis. The female patient in our series is the youngest. Nasal obstruction, pain, and epistaxis were the most common symptoms in our sinonasal melanoma patients which is similar to a study by Meleti et al.[6]

According to Bakkal et al.,[8] the local, regional, and systemic recurrences were 20%, 50%, and 80%, respectively, and all patients with metastasis had lung involvement. Two of our patients who had metastatic disease had lung involvement, and one had developed regional recurrence. As surgery is the primary modality of treatment,[9] three of our patients who had localized disease underwent surgery.

Mendenhall et al.[9] stated that the radiation could reduce local recurrence but has no survival benefit. One of our patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy had developed distant metastasis after 3 months of disease-free survival (DFS). Another patient who received immunotherapy as adjuvant treatment developed regional recurrence after 3 months of DFS.

As noted by various studies,[6],[10] our experience with these patients showed that the outcome was not affected by treatment modality chosen. With the use of hypofractionation schedules and newer treatment delivery techniques, radiotherapy presently improves loco-regional control[7],[11] in malignant melanoma which was once thought to be radio-resistant.[12] However, larger case series and longer follow-up are required to bring further light to this topic.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgment

We would like to show our gratitude to our departmental staff and collegues, especially Dr. Nighat Hussain, Additional Professor and Dr. Vandita Singh, Assistant Professor from the Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, for their assistance in preparation in the manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Weber CO. Surgical Experience and Research, in Addition to Interesting Observations from the Surgical Clinic and the Protestant Hospital Bonn. Berlin, Germany: Reimer G; 1859. p. 304-5.
2Bachar G, Loh KS, O'Sullivan B, Goldstein D, Wood S, Brown D, et al. Mucosal melanomas of the head and neck: Experience of the princess Margaret hospital. Head Neck 2008;30:1325-31.
3Gupta T, Agarwal J, Singh S, Ghosh-Laskar S, Chaturvedi P, Kane S, et al. Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: Tata memorial hospital experience. Int J Head Neck Surg 2010;1(3):141-5.
4Manolidis S, Donald PJ. Malignant mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: Review of the literature and report of 14 patients. Cancer 1997;80:1373-86.
5Szabo G. The number of melanocytes in human epidermis. Br Med J 1954;1:1016-7.
6Meleti M, Leemans CR, de Bree R, Vescovi P, Sesenna E, van der Waal I, et al. Head and neck mucosal melanoma: Experience with 42 patients, with emphasis on the role of postoperative radiotherapy. Head Neck 2008;30:1543-51.
7Wada H, Nemoto K, Ogawa Y, Hareyama M, Yoshida H, Takamura A, et al. A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of external radiotherapy for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck in Northern Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:495-500.
8Bakkal FK, Başman A, Kızıl Y, Ekinci Ö, Gümüşok M, Ekrem Zorlu M, et al. Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: Recurrence characteristics and survival outcomes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;120:575-80.
9Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Hinerman RW, Werning JW, Villaret DB, Mendenhall NP, et al. Head and neck mucosal melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2005;28:626-30.
10Gaze MN, Kerr GR, Smyth JF. Mucosal melanomas of the head and neck: The Scottish experience. The Scottish melanoma group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1990;2:277-83.
11Ballo MT, Ang KK. Radiation therapy for malignant melanoma. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:323-42.
12Paterson R. Classification of tumors in relation to radiosensitivity. Br J Radiol 1933;6:218-33.