Users Online: 314
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE: LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 165-168

Primary central nervous system lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: A regional cancer center experience


Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication21-Dec-2017

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Tamojit Chaudhuri
Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.221341

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma which occurs in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. It has an overall poor prognosis in spite of a multimodality treatment approach including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This study attempts to further delineate the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and radiological profile of PCNSL at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Karnataka, India. Materials and Methods: All the pathologically confirmed PCNSL cases between January 2010 and June 2016, at our center, were analyzed retrospectively. The influence of potential prognostic parameters on overall survival (OS) was investigated by log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Results: Of the 26 PCNSL patients, 17 (65.3%) were males. Median age at diagnosis was 42.5 years. None of the patients had HIV or Epstein-Barr virus positivity and only four patients (15.4%) had B-symptoms. The most common location in the brain was cerebral hemispheres in 15 patients (57%) and 10 patients (38.5%) had multiple intracranial lesions. Histologically, all were diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, except one case of anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Immunohistochemically, 18 patients (69%) had MUM 1 positivity and 20 cases (77%) belonged to nongerminal center subtype. DeAngelis protocol was followed in 24 patients (92%), and among this cohort, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Class 1 (n = 17) and Class 2 (n = 7) patients had a median OS of 25 months and 11 months, respectively. Conclusion: None of the potential prognostic factors had a statistically significant influence on OS in our patients. High-dose methotrexate combined with radiation is an effective therapeutic approach. However, further prospective studies with a large number of patients are needed to identify more effective primary chemotherapy regimens to further improve the treatment outcome.

Keywords: Chemotherapy, high-dose methotrexate, primary central nervous system lymphoma, radiotherapy


How to cite this article:
Rudresha A H, Chaudhuri T, Lakshmaiah KC, Babu G, Lokesh K N, Rajeev L K. Primary central nervous system lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: A regional cancer center experience. South Asian J Cancer 2017;6:165-8

How to cite this URL:
Rudresha A H, Chaudhuri T, Lakshmaiah KC, Babu G, Lokesh K N, Rajeev L K. Primary central nervous system lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: A regional cancer center experience. South Asian J Cancer [serial online] 2017 [cited 2018 Jul 20];6:165-8. Available from: http://journal.sajc.org/text.asp?2017/6/4/165/221341


  Introduction Top


Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) represents a rare subtype of aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) restricted to the craniospinal axis (brain parenchyma, spinal cord, eyes, cranial nerves, and/or meninges), without evidence of a systemic lymphoma at the time of diagnosis.[1] Ocular involvement can occur in 10–15% of cases and leptomeningeal disease is documented in 20–30% of patients.[2] It represents 0.8–6.6% of all primary CNS tumors and about 5% of all extranodal NHLs.[3] The majority (>90%) of PCNSLs are of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) histology, with Burkitt's lymphoma, indolent B-cell lymphomas, and T-cell histologies rarely reported.[4],[5] The only known risk factor for PCNSL development is congenital or acquired immunodeficiency. In the recent era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), a dramatic reduction in the incidence of immunodeficiency-associated PCNSL has occurred, correlating with a decline in the proportion of HIV-infected individuals with CD4+ cell counts <50/mm 3.[6] The fact that unlike the western countries, the association of PCNSL with HIV/AIDS in India is very low in spite of substantial prevalence of HIV/AIDS cases, suggests that there is geographic variation in the risk factors.[7] Historically, PCNSL has been considered to be associated with a significantly worse prognosis than systemic lymphomas of the same histology despite multimodality treatment approach. With high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, with or without whole-brain radiotherapy, a median survival of 51 months has been reported.[8] It remains unclear whether the dismal outcome of PCNSL patients compared with patients with systemic DLBCL is attributable to the immunoprivileged CNS location or reflects a specific aggressive intrinsic biologic behavior.

The best treatment strategy for this rare, aggressive extranodal NHL is still controversial. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the clinical, immunohistochemical, and radiological findings of the PCNSL cases at our center and to evaluate the influence of potential prognostic factors on the overall survival (OS).


  Materials and Methods Top


Patient selection, evaluation, and treatment

All consecutive cases diagnosed with PCNSL between January 2010 and June 2016, at the Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, were investigated retrospectively. All the patients underwent a detailed history and physical examination including a neurological assessment. The localization and number of the CNS lesions were investigated by magnetic resonance imaging, and the diagnosis of CNS lymphoma was confirmed by microscopic examination and immunohistochemistry of the biopsy specimens (stereotactic or open biopsy). To exclude systemic lymphoma at presentation, all patients underwent iliac crest bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan, ophthalmoscopic evaluation, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology for malignant cells. Ultrasound examination of the testes was performed in male patients. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic score [9] was calculated. Patients were treated with either DeAngelis protocol [10] or intensive chemo-immunotherapy with methotrexate, temozolomide, and rituximab induction (high-dose MTR), followed by etoposide and cytarabine consolidation (EA).[11]

Statistical analysis

Duration of OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis until death. The strength of the association between OS and different prognostic variables was investigated by Kaplan–Meier OS curve and log-rank test. These variables included age (≥60 years vs. <60 years), multifocal involvement, deep site involvement (i.e. the corpus callosum, basal ganglia, periventricular region, brainstem, and cerebellum), CD10 staining, MUM1 staining, subtype (germinal center [GC] vs. non-GC [NGC]), and MSKCC prognostic score. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


  Results Top


Totally, 26 cases of PCNSL were retrospectively reviewed. Median age at diagnosis was 42.5 years (range: 21–62 years), with a male/female ratio of 1.88:1 (17:9). None of the patients had HIV or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity. B-symptoms were very uncommon in our series, and only four patients (15.4%) had B-symptoms at presentation. The most common presenting symptoms were raised intracranial tension features (headache, vomiting) in 46% (n = 12), followed by focal neurological deficits (paresthesia/hemiparesis, cranial nerve palsies, dysarthria) in 30% of patients (n = 8). Other presenting symptoms included seizures in 8% (n = 2), visual disturbances in 8% (n = 2), personality changes in 4% (n = 1), and gait disturbances in 4% (n = 1) of patients. The median serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 224 U/L and was elevated in eight patients (30.7%). The most common area of CNS involvement was cerebral hemispheres in 57% (n = 15), followed by periventricular regions in 23% (n = 6), thalamus in 8% (n = 2), cerebellum in 4% (n = 1), leptomeninges in 4% (n = 1), and corpus callosum in 4% (n = 1) of patients. Ten patients (38.5%) had multifocal CNS lesions. As per the MSKCC risk scoring, 19 patients (73%) belonged to Class 1 and the rest were Class 2. The diagnostic procedures employed were stereotactic biopsy in 46% (n = 12), surgical decompression in 42% (n = 1), and gross total excision in 12% (n = 3) of patients. Histologically, all were DLBCL, except one patient who had anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Immunohistochemically, 18 patients (69%) had MUM 1 positivity and 20 patients (77%) belonged to NGC subtype. All of the patients with DLBCL histology (n = 25) were negative for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and had a high Ki-67 index (range: 80–95%; median 90%). The patient with ALCL was positive for ALK and had a Ki-67 index of 70%. All of the cases of NGC subtype were negative for CD10. DeAngelis protocol was followed in 24 patients (92%) and the other 2 patients were treated with MTR regimen, followed by EA. The overall response rate (ORR) was 92% (n = 22) after DeAngelis protocol (n = 24) and 100% after MTR induction (n = 2). The median OS of the patients treated with DeAngelis protocol (n = 24) was 20.5 months (range: 8–62 months). Among this cohort, the MSKCC Class 1 patients (n = 17) had a median OS of 25 months and MSKCC Class 2 patients (n = 7) had a median OS of 11 months [Figure 1]. The 2 patients of the MTR treatment arm had just completed treatment at the time of the last follow-up.
Figure 1: Kaplan–Meier overall survival curve of primary central nervous system lymphoma patients treated with high-dose methotrexate combined with whole-brain radiation therapy (DeAngelis protocol). The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Class 1 patients had a significantly better overall survival than Class 2 patients (log-rank P < 0.000)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Previously, PCNSL was regarded as the tumor of immunosuppressed individuals. However, after the introduction of HAART, the incidence of PCNSL decreased substantially in these patients. Today, the frequency of PCNSL is much higher in immunocompetent individuals than in immunocompromised ones. However, the exact reason for this rising incidence of PCNSL among the immunocompetent population is still obscure.[12] Moreover, whether the disease has a different course in patients without an underlying immune dysfunction is also still unclear. The role of various immunophenotypic markers in predicting survival outcome for this particular patient population is highly debated. Although several implications of EBV, on various types of tumors arising in immunocompromised individuals, are well recognized, its etiological role in PCNSL of immunocompetent patients is still unclear. In the present study, none of our patients had EBV positivity.

Unlike individuals with systemic NHL, patients with PCNSL rarely present with B-symptoms. They classically present with focal neurologic or cognitive deficits, sensory-motor symptoms, and symptoms of raised intracranial pressure.[4],[13],[14] New-onset seizures are less common (10–15%).

Several prognostic classifications were proposed for PCNSL to make practical algorithms and determine the best treatment strategy. The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group has noted that several factors are associated with a poor prognosis in PCNSL. Age >60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1, elevated LDH, high CSF protein concentration, and deep brain involvement were independently predictive of poor survival.[15] The Nottingham/Barcelona score includes age, performance status, and extent of brain disease.[16] A more recent staging system has been developed and validated by the MSKCC Group.[9] The group studied multiple factors in over 300 patients and found only two factors, age and performance status, which were predictive of outcome. These factors were able to differentiate patients into three very different prognostic groups: Class 1: Patients <50 years; Class 2: Patients ≥50 years, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70, and Class 3: Patients ≥50 years, KPS <70. Patients with Class I prognosis experienced a median OS of 8.5 years, whereas patients who were Class III had a median OS of only 1.1 years.[9]

As per the molecular classification, DLBCL can be categorized into GC and NGC subtypes.[17] The NGC subtype has a relatively poor outcome. According to the several published reports, 66–93% of the PCNSL cases belonged to the NGC subgroup.[4],[18],[19] However, none of these studies had demonstrated a statistically significant difference in OS and disease-free survival between these two subtypes. In our series, 77% of the cases were of NGC subtype and there was no significant survival difference between two groups [Table 1].
Table 1: Multivariate analysis of different prognostic variables

Click here to view


Results are conflicting regarding the role of Bcl-6 as an independent prognostic variable. Some studies suggested Bcl-6 as a poor prognostic factor,[18] some demonstrated its association with a more favorable outcome,[20] while others failed to show any impact on survival.[3],[19] Moreover, there was no significant survival difference between Bcl-2 positive and negative groups also in most of the prior reports.[3],[4]

Several studies suggested that young age at diagnosis (<60 years) represents a favorable prognosis,[4],[21] and on the other hand, multifocal involvement and deep site involvement of the brain were proposed to have a negative impact on survival.[15],[20],[22] In our study, we failed to demonstrate an association between these parameters and OS [Table 1]. This may be attributed to the relatively low number of cases enrolled in this study.

High Ki-67 index is a poor prognostic factor in systemic DLBCL, but none of the studies till date showed any significant survival difference between high and low Ki-67 groups.[18],[20] In our series, the median Ki-67 index (90%) was too high to be divided into high and low subgroups.

The historical mainstay of therapy in PCNSL was previously whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone.[23] Because of the limited long-term efficacy of WBRT alone, there has been considerable interest in combining chemotherapy with WBRT to improve response and survival. CHOP-based chemotherapies have been studied [24] but have not offered additional survival benefit to radiation used alone, presumably because of the lack of penetration to the CNS. Subsequent research has centered on the role of systemic methotrexate at doses known to penetrate into the CNS preceding WBRT, which culminated in an RTOG multicenter phase II study of combined modality therapy (CMT) in PCNSL.[10] In this study, ORR reached 94% including 58% complete responses, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 months, with 37 months of median OS. Recently, MSKCC has published long-term follow-up of their experience with CMT.[8] Median OS was 51 months for the entire cohort, and for the patients under 60 years, median PFS and OS had not been reached after 115 months of follow-up. In patients ≥60 years, median OS was only 29 months along with increased neurotoxicity. In an attempt to reduce the toxicity of CMT, the use of chemotherapy alone has been studied. In one multicenter phase II study of high-dose methotrexate (single agent 8 g/m 2)-based therapy, ORR was 74% but median PFS was only 13 months.[25] Final results of the CALGB 50202 trial have been published recently.[11] This study has evaluated the efficacy of dose-intensive chemotherapeutic induction (MTR) and consolidation (EA) strategy in 44 newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL. The rate of CR to MTR was 66%. The overall 2-year PFS was 0.57, with a median follow-up of 4.9 years. Patients >60 years of age responded similarly as younger patients. This study showed first time to our knowledge that dose-intensive consolidation for PCNSL is feasible in the multicenter setting and yields rates of PFS and OS at least comparable to those of regimens involving WBRT. However, the optimal methotrexate-based regimen is still unclear in the literature.


  Conclusion Top


In the current study, we retrospectively investigated the demographic and clinicopathological features of PCNSL cases together with an analysis of potential prognostic factors and their impact on OS. None of the factors had a statistically significant influence on OS. The treatment of PCNSL with high-dose methotrexate combined with WBRT is an effective therapeutic approach. However, further prospective studies with a large patient number are needed to elucidate prognostic factors, as well as optimum treatment regimens including rituximab, particularly in immunocompetent patients with PCNSL.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Campo E, Swerdlow SH, Harris NL, Pileri S, Stein H, Jaffe ES. The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: Evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood 2011;117:5019-32.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Ferreri AJ, Blay JY, Reni M, Pasini F, Gubkin A, Tirelli U, et al. Relevance of intraocular involvement in the management of primary central nervous system lymphomas. Ann Oncol 2002;13:531-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Zhang X, Chen QH, Farmer P, Nasim M, Demopoulos A, Devoe C, et al. Central nervous system lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: The North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System experience. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:75-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Raoux D, Duband S, Forest F, Trombert B, Chambonnière ML, Dumollard JM, et al. Primary central nervous system lymphoma: Immunohistochemical profile and prognostic significance. Neuropathology 2010;30:232-40.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Miller DC, Hochberg FH, Harris NL, Gruber ML, Louis DN, Cohen H. Pathology with clinical correlations of primary central nervous system non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Massachusetts General Hospital experience 1958-1989. Cancer 1994;74:1383-97.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Cheung MC, Pantanowitz L, Dezube BJ. AIDS-related malignancies: Emerging challenges in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Oncologist 2005;10:412-26.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Pasricha S, Gupta A, Gawande J, Trivedi P, Patel D. Primary central nervous system lymphoma: A study of clinicopathological features and trend in Western India. Indian J Cancer 2011;48:199-203.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Gavrilovic IT, Hormigo A, Yahalom J, DeAngelis LM, Abrey LE. Long-term follow-up of high-dose methotrexate-based therapy with and without whole brain irradiation for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4570-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Abrey LE, Ben-Porat L, Panageas KS, Yahalom J, Berkey B, Curran W, et al. Primary central nervous system lymphoma: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic model. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5711-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
DeAngelis LM, Seiferheld W, Schold SC, Fisher B, Schultz CJ; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-10. Combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-10. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4643-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Rubenstein JL, Hsi ED, Johnson JL, Jung SH, Nakashima MO, Grant B, et al. Intensive chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: CALGB 50202 (Alliance 50202). J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3061-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Sierra del Rio M, Rousseau A, Soussain C, Ricard D, Hoang-Xuan K. Primary CNS lymphoma in immunocompetent patients. Oncologist 2009;14:526-39.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Gualco G, Weiss LM, Barber GN, Bacchi CE. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving the central nervous system. Int J Surg Pathol 2011;19:44-50.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Makhdoomi R, Nayil K, Rayees A, Kirmani A, Ramzan A, Khalil MB, et al. Primary CNS lymphoma in immunocompetent: A review of literature and our experience from Kashmir. Turk Neurosurg 2011;21:39-47.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Ferreri AJ, Blay JY, Reni M, Pasini F, Spina M, Ambrosetti A, et al. Prognostic scoring system for primary CNS lymphomas: The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group experience. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:266-72.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Bessell EM, Graus F, Lopez-Guillermo A, Lewis SA, Villa S, Verger E, et al. Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the CNS treated with CHOD/BVAM or BVAM chemotherapy before radiotherapy: Long-term survival and prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:501-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, Gascoyne RD, Delabie J, Ott G, et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood 2004;103:275-82.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Hattab EM, Martin SE, Al-Khatib SM, Kupsky WJ, Vance GH, Stohler RA, et al. Most primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphomas occurring in immunocompetent individuals belong to the nongerminal center subtype: A retrospective analysis of 31 cases. Mod Pathol 2010;23:235-43.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Camilleri-Broët S, Crinière E, Broët P, Delwail V, Mokhtari K, Moreau A, et al. A uniform activated B-cell-like immunophenotype might explain the poor prognosis of primary central nervous system lymphomas: Analysis of 83 cases. Blood 2006;107:190-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Song MK, Chung JS, Joo YD, Lee SM, Oh SY, Shin DH, et al. Clinical importance of Bcl-6-positive non-deep-site involvement in non-HIV-related primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Neurooncol 2011;104:825-31.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Jahnke K, Korfel A, O'Neill BP, Blay JY, Abrey LE, Martus P, et al. International study on low-grade primary central nervous system lymphoma. Ann Neurol 2006;59:755-62.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Tomlinson FH, Kurtin PJ, Suman VJ, Scheithauer BW, O'Fallon JR, Kelly PJ, et al. Primary intracerebral malignant lymphoma: A clinicopathological study of 89 patients. J Neurosurg 1995;82:558-66.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Nelson DF, Martz KL, Bonner H, Nelson JS, Newall J, Kerman HD, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the brain: Can high dose, large volume radiation therapy improve survival? Report on a prospective trial by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG): RTOG 8315. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;23:9-17.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Mead GM, Bleehen NM, Gregor A, Bullimore J, Shirley D, Rampling RP, et al. A medical research council randomized trial in patients with primary cerebral non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Cerebral radiotherapy with and without cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy. Cancer 2000;89:1359-70.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Batchelor T, Carson K, O'Neill A, Grossman SA, Alavi J, New P, et al. Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma with methotrexate and deferred radiotherapy: A report of NABTT 96-07. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1044-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed256    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded68    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal