Nueclear Web Banner
Users Online: 87
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE: MELANOMA AND SKIN CANCER
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 134-136

Experiences of two different modalities in the management of choroidal melanoma in the Asian Indian population


1 PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Pediatric Retina and Ocular Oncology, Aravind Eye Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication14-Sep-2017

Correspondence Address:
Parag K Shah
Department of Pediatric Retina and Ocular Oncology, Aravind Eye Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_160_16

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Choroidal malignant melanoma is a rare intraocular cancer in Asian Indian population. There is a paucity of data from our population comparing iodine 125 (I-125) brachytherapy and enucleation. Aim: This study aims to compare two groups of choroidal melanoma patients treated with either I-125 brachytherapy or enucleation in the Asian Indian population. Objectives: To evaluate the long-term morbidity and mortality rates in choroidal melanoma patients treated with either I-125 brachytherapy or enucleation. Methods: It is a retrospective study involving forty four eyes, diagnosed with choroidal melanoma from May 2008 to February 2015. All were evaluated preoperatively for metastasis. Twenty-two underwent globe salvaging I-125 brachytherapy surgery whereas remaining 22 underwent globe destructive primary enucleation procedure. Results: At a mean follow-up 39 months, 2 of 22 cases (9%) died in the brachytherapy group. One was secondary to metastasis in the liver while the other case died of a natural cause. In the enucleation group also, there were two deaths (9%) secondary to metastasis. The metastasis free survival was 95% in the brachytherapy group and 91% in the enucleation group, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.3577). Kaplan–Meier survival at 3 years and 5 years was 95% and 89% for brachytherapy group and 94% and 89% for enucleation group. Conclusion: This study found no difference in the long-term survival of choroidal melanoma patients treated with either brachytherapy or enucleation in the Asian Indian eyes.

Keywords: Choroidal melanoma, enucleation, India, iodine 125 brachytherapy


How to cite this article:
Meeralakshmi P, Shah PK, Narendran V. Experiences of two different modalities in the management of choroidal melanoma in the Asian Indian population. South Asian J Cancer 2017;6:134-6

How to cite this URL:
Meeralakshmi P, Shah PK, Narendran V. Experiences of two different modalities in the management of choroidal melanoma in the Asian Indian population. South Asian J Cancer [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 21];6:134-6. Available from: http://journal.sajc.org/text.asp?2017/6/3/134/214577


  Introduction Top


Choroidal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults.[1],[2] It is more prevalent in the Caucasian population with an incidence of about 5.1 cases per million population per year in the United States.[3] Studies done across Europe and the Americas have also confirmed this incidence pattern establishing white race as a risk factor.[4],[5],[6] This tumor is relatively rare among the pigmented population. In India, it is considered a rare diagnosis with very few published reports about this entity.[7],[8] Even though it is rare, it assumes significance in that it is the leading primary intraocular disease which can cause mortality in adults.

The management of this condition assumes specific challenges in the Indian context. Since the incidence is quite low, clinical suspicion is not routinely aroused. Indirect ophthalmoscopy is not a routinely performed diagnostic protocol in the primary and most of the secondary eye care centers in the region. Added to this, the innocuous and slow growing nature of this condition in the early stages contributes to the delay in the diagnosis. Very often, it is recognized after the tumor has caused a retinal detachment.[9] All these factors may result in the tumor progressing to a very advanced stage, at which time, the only treatment of choice would be surgical enucleation.

Globally, the treatment protocols for uveal malignant melanoma have largely been influenced by the results of the Collobarative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS).[10],[11] This randomized study compared the efficacy of two treatment modalities, namely, iodine 125 (I-125) brachytherapy and surgical enucleation in the treatment of medium-sized uveal melanoma. The end point of this study was to assess cancer free survival among the individuals randomized to both these groups. Interestingly, this study found the two treatment modalities to be comparable. These results may not be entirely applicable to a developing country situation, typified by the Indian subcontinent. Enucleation is the most commonly performed surgical procedure, while brachytherapy is not extensively practiced. I-125 brachytherapy using indigenously manufactured Bhabha Atomic Research Center I-125 Ocu-Prosta seeds in the treatment of choroidal melanoma has been recently reported.[9] In this study, it was found that the eyes subjected to this treatment protocol demonstrated excellent tumor control. There are significant advantages of brachytherapy like the anatomic preservation of the eye and vision. However, this modality may also require the patients to come for regular follow-up and there is every likelihood that this treatment modality may have challenges in implementation in the Indian context. There are no studies comparing brachytherapy versus primary enucleation for choroidal melanomas in the Indian population, because of its rarity. This comparative study may provide valuable insights into the preferred treatment modality in our population and probably pave a way for establishing a preferred practice pattern for treating this rare condition in India.


  Methods Top


This is a retrospective case series of forty-four patients who presented with choroidal melanoma at our institute from May 2008 to February 2015. The initial diagnosis and assessment was done after detailed history taking and a comprehensive ocular examination by an ophthalmologist, which included visual acuity assessment, slip lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and ocular ultrasonography. These tumors were classified into small, medium, and large according to the COMS criteria.[11] The patients also underwent a chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography, and a clinical examination by an oncologist to screen for tumor metastasis. The treatment options were explained to all the patients and based on mutual decision they were treated with either brachytherapy or enucleation. Brachytherapy was preferred for all medium-sized melanoma cases while enucleation was preferred for the large-sized tumors. Informed consent was taken from all the patients and this study was approved by the ethics committee.

Brachytherapy procedure using the I-125 indigenous seeds was done using gold plaques.[9] The plaque was placed over the sclera, just below the tumor. A total dose of 85 Gy was calculated till the tumor apex. After removing the plaque, the patient was reviewed periodically to monitor for tumor regression.[9] In case of enucleation, after surgically removing the whole globe, a silicon implant was placed immediately followed by a prosthetic eye placement after 1 month. All enucleated specimens were sent for histopathology. Postoperative metastatic workup was done on a yearly basis for all the cases. Statistical analysis was done using student t-test for quantitative variables. Chi-square test was used for evaluation of differences in proportions. P < 0.5 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS 12.0 software (vesion 12.0, IBM, USA).


  Results Top


Forty-four patients were diagnosed with choroidal melanoma. Of these, 22 patients (50%) were treated with brachytherapy, while the rest 22 (50%) were treated by enucleation. The baseline characteristics of both groups of patients are given in [Table 1].
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of both the brachytherapy and enucleation groups

Click here to view


There was one case in the enucleation group which initially presented with a small melanoma and was lost to follow-up. He came back after 7 months with secondary angle closure glaucoma with total retinal detachment and large intraocular mass and the eye was enucleated after that. Histopathology of this patient revealed epithelioid subtype.

Patients who underwent brachytherapy received a mean dose of 0.55 Gy/h. The average height of the tumor was reduced to 4.8 mm after treatment. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean basal diameter of the tumors (P = 0.0413) after brachytherapy. In 3 cases (14%), the tumor completely regressed. 3 eyes were pseudophakic before brachytherapy. At the mean follow-up period of 39 months (range 6-86 months), 13 patients (59%) developed brachytherapy-related complications. The median follow-up was 30 months. Cataract was seen in 4 (18%) cases, radiation retinopathy in 7 cases (32%), radiation neuropathy in 4 (18%), secondary glaucoma in one case (4.6%), and corneal epithelial defect in one case (4.6%). Three eyes were secondarily enucleated in the brachytherapy group. Of these, two were enucleated because of suspected tumor recurrence (both of which showed mixed cell type on histopathology), and one because the patient complained of severe pain. Thus, the globe salvage rate was 86% (19/22 eyes) and the tumor control rate was 91% (20/22 eyes). Prebrachytherapy, 13 eyes (59%) had visual acuity >20/40 compared to only 5 (23%) cases, postbrachytherapy.

In the enucleation group, the histological subtypes were, 9 (41%) with spindle cells, two (9%) with epithelioid and 9 (41%) with mixed subtype. Histopathology of one eye showed a melanocytoma. All were fitted with silicone implants and customized prosthesis.

Two (9%) cases died in the brachytherapy group. One was secondary to metastasis in the liver while the other case died of a natural cause. In the enucleation group also, there were two deaths (9%) secondary to metastasis [Table 2]. Both these cases had delayed enucleation from the time of diagnosis. The metastasis free survival was 95% in the brachytherapy group and 91% in the enucleation group, which was not statistically significant (P = 1). A subgroup analysis comparing only medium-sized tumors with similar follow-up from both groups (six from enucleation group and nine from brachytherapy group) did not show any significant difference in metastasis and survival.
Table 2: Outcomes of brachytherapy and enucleation groups

Click here to view


Kaplan–Meier survival at 3 years and 5 years for the brachytherapy group was 95% and 89%, and for the enucleation group, it was 94% and 89%, respectively.


  Discussion Top


The management of choroidal melanoma is challenging in India for several reasons. First, the incidence is much less in the Indian population when compared with the Caucasian population.[7],[8] Second, due to its rarity, patients are very often misdiagnosed and the correct diagnosis is attained at a much later stage.[12] Third, very few centers in India provide eye salvaging treatments such as brachytherapy. Thus, the most commonly performed treatment modality in India for this condition is enucleation.[12],[13],[14] Very few reports about the alternative treatment options available in India exist in the literature.[9],[15] There are no studies from India comparing these two treatment modalities for choroidal melanoma, due to the low incidence of this disease. This is the first study comparing long-term survival after brachytherapy and enucleation for choroidal melanomas in the Asian Indian population.

The COMS study, which was done mainly on Caucasian population, found that both the treatment modalities had comparable outcomes with regard to metastasis and mortality.[10] After 5 years, the survival rate was 81% and 82% in the enucleation and the brachytherapy group, respectively. In this study, done on the Asian Indian population, only one patient in the brachytherapy group and two in the enucleation group developed metastasis. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 1). Another patient in the brachytherapy group died of a natural cause. Thus, the metastasis free survival in our study was 95% in the brachytherapy group and 91% in the enucleation group. The 5 years survival rate was 89% for both groups.

The recurrence rate following globe salvaging I-125 brachytherapy in the COMS was 10.3% and 12.5% required enucleation. Thus, the tumor salvage rate for the COMS study was 89.7% and the globe salvage rate was 87.5%.[16] The tumor salvage rate in our study was 91% and the globe salvage rate was in 84%. In another study with large tumors,[17] 80% of these eyes could be retained.

Our study showed radiation retinopathy as the most common complication encountered in 32% of the cases. Thirteen cases (59%) had presenting visual acuity better than 20/40 in the brachytherapy group which dropped to 5 (23%) post 3 years after brachytherapy. In the COMS trial, 70% had presenting visual acuity better than 20/40 and it dropped to 34% at the end of 3 years.[18]

In the COMS,[17] of the primary enucleated eyes, 9%, 5%, and 86% were spindle cell type, epithelioid type and mixed cell type respectively compared to 41%, 9%, and 41%, in our study. Other studies from India have found 25%, 10%, 63%,[12] and 53.9%, 18.4%, 18.4%[13] to be spindle cell type, epithelioid type, and mixed cell type, respectively. One case (4.5%) in our study was misdiagnosed and was found to have melanocytoma on histopathology. In the COMS, fives eyes were misdiagnosed and they had a very high diagnostic accuracy of 99.7%[19] compared to 95.5% in our study. Few authors have even tried intravitreal bevacizumab along with plaque therapy.[20] However, it was not tried for any of our cases.

There are some definite limitations to this study. First, it is a retrospective study with a small sample size and second the brachytherapy group had more medium sized tumors compared to the enucleation group (86% vs 32%). However, a subgroup analysis of medium-sized melanomas in our study, showed no difference in metastasis and long-term survival between both groups.


  Conclusion Top


Brachytherapy seems to be a promising eye preserving technique for eyes with choroidal melanomas in the Asian Indian population.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Shields JA, Shields CL, editors. Posterior uveal melanoma: Clinical features. In: Intraocular Tumors. An Atlas and Textbook. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Wolters Kluwer; 2016. p. 95-127.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Seddon JM, McCannel TA. Epidemiology of posterior uveal melanoma. In: Ryan SJ, Sadda SR, Hinton DR, Schachat AP, Wilkinson CP, Wiedemann P, editors. Retina. New York: Elsevier Saunders Inc.; 2013. p. 2231-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Singh AD, Turell ME, Topham AK. Uveal melanoma: Trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1881-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Raivio I. Uveal melanoma in Finland. An epidemiological, clinical, histological and prognostic study. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1977;133:1-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Birdsell JM, Gunther BK, Boyd TA, Grace M, Jerry LM. Ocular melanoma: A population-based study. Can J Ophthalmol 1980;15:9-12.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Osterlind A. Trends in incidence of ocular malignant melanoma in Denmark 1943-1982. Int J Cancer 1987;40:161-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Manohar S, Ramakrishnan R, Das TP, Namperumalsamy P. Malignant melanoma of choroid. Indian J Ophthalmol 1991;39:70-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Biswas J, Krishnakumar S, Shanmugam MP. Uveal melanoma in Asian Indians: A clinicopathological study. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:522-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Shah PK, Selvaraj U, Narendran V, Guhan P, Saxena SK, Dash A. Indigenous (125)I brachytherapy source for the management of intraocular melanomas in India. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2013;28:21-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Diener-West M, Earle JD, Fine SL, Hawkins BS, Moy CS, Reynolds SM, et al. The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, III: Initial mortality findings. COMS report no. 18. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:969-82.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Design and methods of a clinical trial for a rare condition: The collaborative ocular melanoma study. COMS report no. 3. Control Clin Trials 1993;14:362-91.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dhupper M, Biswas J, Gopal L, Kumar SK, Khetan V. Clinicopathological correlation of choroidal melanoma in Indian population: A study of 113 cases. Oman J Ophthalmol 2012;5:42-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Kashyap S, Venkatesh P, Sen S, Khanduja S, Shrey D, Tinwala S, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of choroidal melanoma in a North Indian population: Analysis of 10-year data. Int Ophthalmol 2014;34:235-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sengupta S, Krishnakumar S, Biswas J, Gopal L, Khetan V. Fifteen-year trends in indications for enucleation from a tertiary care center in South India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60:179-82.  Back to cited text no. 14
  [Full text]  
15.
Khetan V, Gopal L, Shanmugam MP, Gupta A, Sharma T, Bhende P, et al. Brachytherapy of intra ocular tumors using 'BARC I-125 Ocu-prosta seeds': An Indian experience. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:158-62.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Jampol LM, Moy CS, Murray TG, Reynolds SM, Albert DM, Schachat AP, et al. The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: IV. Local treatment failure and enucleation in the first 5 years after brachytherapy. COMS report no. 19. Ophthalmology 2002;109:2197-206.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Puusaari I, Heikkonen J, Summanen P, Tarkkanen A, Kivelä T. Iodine brachytherapy as an alternative to enucleation for large uveal melanomas. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2223-34.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Melia BM, Abramson DH, Albert DM, Boldt HC, Earle JD, Hanson WF, et al. Collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS) randomized trial of I-125 brachytherapy for medium choroidal melanoma. I. Visual acuity after 3 years COMS report no. 16. Ophthalmology 2001;108:348-66.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Histopathologic characteristics of uveal melanomas in eyes enucleated from the collaborative ocular melanoma study. COMS report no. 6. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:745-66.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Houston SK, Shah NV, Decatur C, Lonngi M, Feuer W, Markoe AM, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab combined with plaque brachytherapy reduces melanoma tumor volume and enhances resolution of exudative detachment. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:193-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed42    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded12    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal