Nueclear Web Banner
Users Online: 162
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 136

Osteosarcoma metastases in penis


Department of Pathology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, India

Date of Web Publication27-Jun-2013

Correspondence Address:
I V Renuka
Department of Pathology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.114117

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Aparna C, Renuka I V, Bala G S, Annapurna P. Osteosarcoma metastases in penis. South Asian J Cancer 2013;2:136

How to cite this URL:
Aparna C, Renuka I V, Bala G S, Annapurna P. Osteosarcoma metastases in penis. South Asian J Cancer [serial online] 2013 [cited 2017 Dec 18];2:136. Available from: http://journal.sajc.org/text.asp?2013/2/3/136/114117

Dear Editor,

Metastatic deposits in penis are extremely rare. We report a case of secondary deposit from an osteosarcoma in a 35-year-old male patient who presented with dysuria. This case is reported in view of its rarity and to emphasize the need to consider the possibility of a metastatic disease for any soft tissue mass discovered at the time of diagnosis, during treatment, or after treatment of osteosarcoma. In spite of its rich vascularity and extensive circulatory communication between the penis and neighboring organs, penile metastases are uncommon. [1],[2] Even if they occur, 75% of cases are from genital tract. [2] Most of these cases are associated with disseminated disease at the time of presentation. Patients may present with priapism, painful nodule (peyronies disease), and urinary obstruction. [1],[2],[3],[4] More than 80% of the cases die within 6 months.

A 35-year-old man came to the urology clinic with difficulty in micturition. On examination, there was a fungating growth on the distal part of the penis. Based on clinical examination, it was diagnosed as a squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. The patient had a history of above knee amputation for osteosarcoma of the femur 4 years ago. He had received neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy.

We received a partial penectomy specimen of size 5 × 3.5 × 3 cm [Figure 1]. External surface showed a fungating cauliflower-like growth of 3.5 × 2.5 cm. On cut section, the tumor was hard in consistency involving the corpora cavernosa and urethra. Urethral opening was obscured.
Figure 1: Gross photograph of partially amputated specimen of penis with a cauliflower-like growth

Click here to view



  Microscopy Top


Sections studied showed hyperkeratotic and hyperplastic squamous epithelium. Sub epithelium revealed a tumor composed of spindle-shaped cells in fascicles. Individual cells showed nuclear pleomorphism, high mitotic activity with foci of calcification, and tumor osteoid formation. Tumor giant cells were also seen [Figure 2], [Figure 3]. Urethra was totally obscured. Cut end of the shaft was free from tumor. Thus, patient was diagnosed with metastases of osteosarcoma to the penis, rather than primary squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
Figure 2: Hyperkeratotic squamous epithelium with underlying tumor and osteoid (H and E, × 10)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Tumor osteoid lined by pleomorphic osteoblasts (H and E, × 40)

Click here to view


Metastasis to penis is a rare phenomenon, despite the rich vascularity and complex circulation of this organ. Majority of the metastatic lesions to the penis are from bladder, colon, rectum, kidney, and testis. [5] Isolated cases of metastasis from larynx, lung, skin, osseous tumors, are reported in literature. [1]

Penile secondaries commonly affect the shaft or glans penis. Bilateral involvement of the corpora cavernosa is seen, but preputial lesions are uncommon. Isolated secondary deposits involving fore skin alone are also reported. [1]

Main presenting features of penis secondaries include priapism, dysuria and indurated mass lesion. In our case, the presenting feature was dysuria.

The earliest report of secondary penile malignancy is credited to Eberth in 1870, when he reported metastasis from an adenocarcinoma of the rectum. [1] Paquin and Roland postulated the various possible mechanisms of spread of tumors to the penis.

Following are the five most accepted mechanisms: (a) retrograde venous route, (b) retrograde lymphatic route, (c) arterial spread, (d) direct extension, (e) implantation, secondary to instrumentation. The mean age of presentation is usually between 60 and 80 years. [1] In the present case, the patient was 35 years old. The choice of treatment is generally influenced by general health of the patient, as well as the site of primary, extent of metastatic spread, and the severity of symptoms. In the present case, partial penectomy was done as a palliative measure. After 6 months the patient was lost to follow-up.

 
  References Top

1.Cherian J, Rajan S, Thwaini A, Elmasry Y, Shah T, Puri R. Secondary penile tumors revisited. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2006;3:33.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Osther PF, Løntoft E. Metastasis to the penis. Case reports and review of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol 1991;23:161-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Prabhu S, Pai KR, Diaz EA, Joshua CC, Ala S, Bobby M. Penile metastasis from carcinoma of the rectum; a case report. Indian J Urol 2003;19:165-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
  Medknow Journal  
4.Harper M, Arya M, Shah PJ. A lump in the penis. J R Soc Med 2002;95:38-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Philip J, Joseph Mathew J. Penile metastasis of prostatic adenocarcinoma: Report of two cases and review of literature. World J Surg Oncology 2003;1:16-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Relevance of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for penile metastasis after prostatectomy: uncommon case report and brief review of the literature
Valeria Fiaschetti,Valeria Liberto,Giulia Claroni,Giorgio Loreni,Vincenzo Formica,Mario Roselli,Alessandro Mauriello,Roberto Floris
Radiology Case Reports. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Microscopy
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2187    
    Printed27    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded372    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal